Transcendence
Reprinted with permission from
Desire The Tantric Path to Awakening
by Daniel Odier
Questions:
Passions, Ego Freedom
How do I
recognize the difference between real passion - an act of the senses
that unfolds from a yoga point of view, spherically as you say - and one
that is simply coming from an ego-tied search for pleasure?
When the ego
enters into play, this is accompanied by a mental performance. We
anticipate, we judge, we weigh the forthcoming pleasure by trying to
know in what way this pleasure will truly satisfy us. We become strained
and tense. Our mind becomes agitated. We set up a choice, we apply a
strategy, we grasp onto the object of our desire, use it, and then
reject it once we are satisfied. We do this with people, with objects,
with our senses, emotions, and our thoughts. We feed ourselves like
predators. We impoverish the world in our own interest, we cause harm,
we reveal that an unhealthy love is at work.
What does a
tantrika do? When a stimulation arises, it is only the expression of the
tantrika's own inner tremoring vibration. She relaxes, gets herself in
tune, opens her sensitivity, allows the source of the heart to emerge
freely. Through her movements and actions, plenitude expresses itself.
Her mind remains peaceful, without waves. In each impassioned tremoring
vibration, she recognizes the tremoring vibration of her own
consciousness. She tastes the world without destroying its harmony. She
does not grasp; she does not accumulate. A thing or a person comes up:
She meets it with naked presence. This person or thing disappears: She
stays in the flow of presence, aware of the entirely new splendour of
what just appeared to her. Nothing is fixed; she gets hooked by, hooks
onto, nothing. Her life perpetually renews itself, and her peaceful mind
does not hinder the course of things. She keeps herself in the natural
state of the mind that her master revealed to her. Stable, steady,
tremoring to her inner vibration, sensitive, and present, she plays,
intention-free, to the rhythm of reality and in this way, each moment,
she realizes her true nature.
But is this not an egoist attitude? Where is compassion in this
approach?
We cannot do a
greater good to another human being than to accord him our naked
awareness, devoid of all plan. This is the very space of freedom, which
he will get a taste of through our presence. In this respect for the
other, a mirror without any smudges of volition is presented. The other
person can hence see his own freedom and see that there is no longer any
separation from the world. That is love. Tantrikas hardly ever use the
word compassion, because it implies a slightly condescending duality,
whereas love is a nondifferentiated state.
A person who
feels loved in such a way feels liberated from mental elaboration and
finds herself plunged into the deepest practice of yoga. If she succeeds
in getting a taste of this state, the nostalgia for unity comes back to
her and, naturally, she will glide toward a more and more silent, a
deeper and deeper presence to the world. What more can one give to a
human being?
But the ideal of the Bodhisattva, in Buddhism, isn't it exactly to
refuse to enter into nirvana as long as all human beings have not
reached it?
The
Bodhisattva does not differentiate between nirvana and samsara. For him,
full consciousness of reality is nirvana. He therefore has no place to
go to and even less to wait for, because there is no duality between
worldly experience and nirvana. There also is no difference between the
Bodhisattva and the person whom a Bodhisattva could help. It is this
nondifferentiation between the states of nirvana and samsara, this
~differentiation between people, this nondifferentiation between subject
and object that liberates people. Everything, for the Bodhisattva
happens in the consciousness of an absolute nature. "The fact
that this consciousness is neither associated, nor not associated with
attraction, aversion, confusion, or hindrances; here is the pure
luminosity of consciousness," reads one sutra.
Can it be said, then that it is all right for a practitioner to
experiment with pleasure? Certain masters say that desire and passions
must be cut off to attain awakening.
If you think
desire and passions must be cut off, do it. Put all your energy into
this project and see after a while if the flames of desire and passions
have gone out in you. Examine the situation clearly. Have you found
plenitude? Are you emancipated from desires and passions? Take a little
tour around the city come out of your retreat. Walk around; watch
people. Are you really emancipated from desires and passions? Then
examine the state of your sensitivity of perception. Has it developed,
or on the contrary has it become weakened, wilted, withered? Do certain
expressions of the body, voices, emotions, desires of others bother you?
Have you found a joyous stability, an enthusiasm in the face of life? Is
there no coldness or hardness in your gaze, in your body, in your mind?
If this is the case, if nothing disturbs you anymore, you have
succeeded.
This is an
extremely difficult undertaking. Man-An, the seventeenth-century Zen
master, has said, drawing on a stanza from the poem by the Third
Patriarch of Ch'an, Seng t'san:
The Third
Patriarch of Zen said, "If you want to head for the Way of Unity,
do not be averse to the objects of the six senses [the mind is the sixth
sense]." This does not mean that you should indulge in the objects
of the six senses; it means that you should keep right mindfulness
continuous, neither grasping nor rejecting the objects of the six senses
in the course of everyday life, like a duck going to water without its
feathers getting wet.
If, in contrast, you despise the objects of the six senses and try to
avoid them, you fall into escapist tendencies and never fulfil the Way
of Buddhahood. If you clearly see the essence, then the objects of the
six senses are themselves meditation, sensual desires are themselves the
Way of Unity, and all things are manifestations of Reality. Entering
into the great Zen stability undivided by movement and stillness, body
and mind are both freed and eased.
As for people who set out to cultivate spiritual practice with aversion
to the objects and desires of the senses, even if their minds and
thoughts are empty and still and their contemplative visualization is
perfectly clear, still when they leave quietude and get into active
situations, they are like fish out of water, like monkeys out of trees.
But
integrating the whole of the desires and the passions with the quest is
also a difficult path, because this path demands total clarity about
what you really are, with no reference to what you would like to be. By
this patient examination you will come to know and discover yourself in
reality. You will bring to the light of day all your psychological
functionings, your whole sensorality, your thoughts, and your feelings.
Rather than
straining toward an objective such as liberating yourself from desire,
which is a desire itself, you will enter a virgin space where the
fundamental freedom of your consciousness will surface little by little.
By slipping into the flow of life, you will have the joyous and luminous
experience that the Tantric masters talk about. You will at last be
present to reality, not to your objectives, and in this shadowless,
maskless reality you will little by little discover the infinite. At
this point, you will no longer be anything but love and source.
"Everything that flows is good," I once heard someone say.
Published by Inner
Traditions Vermont USA 2001 www.InnerTraditions.com
Click for More Pictures also see http://www.tantrayoga.ning.com
Back
to Home Page